But even still, you’ll almost certainly need additional resources and practice with real humans to ever reach anything close to fluency in your target language. You may enjoy it and feel it’s worth the money if that’s you.
Review of rosetta stone spanish course professional#
see this comment), mainly those who are learning a language as a hobby (it may not be suitable if you’re learning for professional or academic reasons) and don’t want to be too stressed out. With that said, though, Rosetta Stone still offers value to some people (e.g. That’s a lot of negative feedback in only 9 comments submitted so far! Rosetta Stone is quite simple (just a “fancy flash card sort of setup” according to this comment), there is “no human being to explain why certain things are the way they are” (see this comment), it can be unclear what pictures shown are supposed to mean, their speech recognition feature is “highly ineffective” (see this comment) and “it’s almost laughable how inaccurate some of the phrases they teach are” (see this comment). To summarize, here’s how Rosetta Stone stacks up: while several people have said good things about Rosetta Stone and benefited from it, there is a significant amount of criticism for it as well, and it seems that for many people there would be better resources to use. This article is a compilation of all the best comments I got back. But is Rosetta Stone actually effective? To find out, I put out this simple query:įor people who have used Rosetta Stone to learn a language, what did you think of it and would you recommend it to others? All comments welcome. The company’s been around since 1992 and has well over 1,000 employees and revenue somewhere in the ~$250 million per year range. Rosetta Stone is a giant in the language learning industry, with practically anyone who has ever tried to learn a new language having heard of it.
0 kommentar(er)
